0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ºñÆÇÀû»ç°í ÇÔ¾çÀ» À§ÇÑ È¿À²Àû Çкΰ£È£±³À° ¹æ¾È ¸ð»ö

Exploring Nursing Education Modality for Facilitating Undergraduate Students¡¯ Critical Thinking: Focus Group Interview Analysis

¼ºÀΰ£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2013³â 25±Ç 2È£ p.125 ~ 135
KMID : 0367020130250020125
À强¿Á ( Chang Sung-Ok ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

°øÀº¼÷ ( Kong Eun-Suk ) - ¿¹¼ö´ëÇб³ °£È£ÇкÎ
±è³²ÃÊ ( Kim Nam-Cho ) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
±èÃá±æ ( Kim Chun-Gill ) - ÇѸ²´ëÇб³ °£È£ÇкÎ
±èÈñ°æ ( Kim Hee-Kyung ) - °øÁÖ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
¼Û¹Ì¼ø ( Song Mi-Soon ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
¾È¼ö¿¬ ( Ahn Soo-Yeon ) - ÇѸ²´ëÇб³ °£È£ÇкÎ
ÀÌ¿µÈÖ ( Lee Young-Whee ) - ÀÎÇÏ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
Á¶¸í¿Á ( Cho Myung-Ok ) - µ¿ÀÇ´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
ÃÖ°æ¼÷ ( Choi Kyung-Sook ) - Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ Àû½ÊÀÚ°£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to explore nursing education modality for facilitating undergraduate students¡¯ critical thinking within the Korean nursing education context. Methods: Data were collected from four group interviews from two focus groups, which were composed of six nursing professors in each group. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: Five themes with 13 sub-themes involving 10 categories were delineated. The five themes were managing shared resources, a supportive system in preparing qualified faculty, reflective thinking (self-directed learning), theory courses for understanding nursing resources, and clinical practicum for exercising critical thinking. Conclusion: A nursing educational model for facilitating critical thinking within Korean context was suggested. This could be used as an accelerator in developing nursing undergraduate course programs for critical thinking in Korea.
KeyWords
°£È£±³À°
Nursing education
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed